Freedom and responsibility as the foundation of the human experience
How do freedom and responsibility go side by side
Any scientific solution of this problem rests on the practical solution of the problem of the individual's right to real freedom. The cosmonaut who ventures into outer space is moved by his sense of duty to his people, and this inhibits the innate defensive biological reaction which generates a sense of fear. What is more, the aim that the person sets himself does not always coincide with his motive, i. The feudal lord possessed great freedom and arbitrary power because his subjects were deprived of freedom. That is why Kant maintains that there may be contradictions between freedom and necessity in one and the same human action. Although human beings are unique and intelligent, when they lack wisdom, they often misuse their so-called freedom for the wrong purpose. If everything is preordained, where is the fault of the criminal or the merit of the good man and the hero? Interpreting fate as a manifestation of an infinitely remote and mystically frightening divine will, the neo-Thomists urge us to submit to fate.
But they all lie in the zone of activity of knowable natural and social laws. The entire system of connections between the individual, nature and society, all the demands that society makes on the individual and the individual's dependence on the world are in constant contradiction with the idea of free will.
It is also held by some philosophers who, as materialists, are opposed to religion and idealism, but believe that everything that happens in the world is predetermined by the "iron chain of cause and effect".
The Middle Ages saw a deepening of the subjective world and the formation of a complex hierarchy of personalities— the divinity, the tsar or king as god's deputy on earth, the servant of god, the feudal lord, the steward and so on. According to my view, such freedom doesn't really mean too much.
Freedom and responsibility go hand in hand essay
Guided by a profound social awareness, their hearts yearn for freedom in the name of the happiness of the poor and oppressed. According to my view, such freedom doesn't really mean too much. The Christian world-view condemns fatalism. Although human beings are unique and intelligent, when they lack wisdom, they often misuse their so-called freedom for the wrong purpose. Their ego pushes them in the wrong direction. Knowledge in itself is not yet freedom, but there can be no freedom without it. With the rise of the state the concept of individual responsibility to the state, the monarch and to God began to take shape. It encompasses the meaning of history and stands as the true criterion of social progress. As an integral attribute of the socially developed personality, responsibility takes the form of the spiritual aspect of all forms of the individual's activity in the moral, political, civic, legal and other spheres.
As a reality it is always full of concrete historical meaning. For example, an honest person acts on principle and we say that he could not act otherwise. However, every denial has to be made from certain, perhaps not fully conscious positions, implying a positive principle, which justifies a person's rejection of something and expresses the meaning and value of his rejection.
The call for freedom has always had popular appeal.
based on 12 review